This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Esser, F. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Editorial Structures and Work Principles in British and German Newsrooms

Work in newsrooms can be organized in various ways following different principles. For historical reasons, German and Anglo-Saxon newspaper offices operate quite differently. Whereas British and American newspapers favour centralized newsrooms with a high division of labour, German newspapers tend to decentralize their work by maintaining many more branch offices which produce complete sections of the paper. In addition, employees in German newsrooms have more responsibilities and perform a greater range of journalistic tasks than their Anglo-Saxon counterparts. The reason is that in Germany a `holistic' understanding of journalism prevails; editorial work is regarded as an `integrated whole' not to be broken up. As the present study demonstrates, editorial work can be modelled on different organizational principles — each having advantages and disadvantages. The known and established routines of one country are neither the only ones nor necessarily the best. This article sets out to compare British and German newsroom structures, discusses characteristics, causes and consequences of the different models and evaluates them in context of the respective journalistic systems. It also demonstrates that in newsroom analyses, `open' and `closed' organizations as well as `personal' and `organizational bias' must be distinguished.

Key Words: cross-country comparison • journalistic tradition • newsroom organization • political communication • quality improvement

European Journal of Communication, Vol. 13, No. 3, 375-405 (1998)
DOI: 10.1177/0267323198013003004


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				F. Hanusch A Product of Their Culture: Using a Value Systems Approach to Understand the Work Practices of Journalists International Communication Gazette, November 1, 2009; 71(7): 613 - 626. [Abstract] [PDF]

				R. A. Novais National Influences in Foreign News: British and Portuguese Press Coverage of the Dili Massacre in East Timor International Communication Gazette, December 1, 2007; 69(6): 553 - 573. [Abstract] [PDF]

				B. Josephi Journalism in the Global Age: Between Normative and Empirical International Communication Gazette, December 1, 2005; 67(6): 575 - 590. [Abstract] [PDF]

				M. Gleissner and C. H. de Vreese News about the EU Constitution: Journalistic challenges and media portrayal of the European Union Constitution Journalism, May 1, 2005; 6(2): 221 - 242. [Abstract] [PDF]

				A. Lavie and S. Lehman-Wilzig The method is the message: Explaining inconsistent findings in gender and news production research Journalism, February 1, 2005; 6(1): 66 - 89. [Abstract] [PDF]

				C. H. de Vreese Election Coverage - New Directions for Public Broadcasting: The Netherlands and Beyond European Journal of Communication, June 1, 2001; 16(2): 155 - 180. [Abstract] [PDF]

				M. de Bruin Gender, organizational and professional identities in journalism Journalism, August 1, 2000; 1(2): 217 - 238. [Abstract] [PDF]

				M. Deuze Journalism and the Web: An Analysis of Skills and Standards in an Online Environment International Communication Gazette, October 1, 1999; 61(5): 373 - 390. [Abstract] [PDF]