Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
European Journal of Communication
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by van Cuilenburg, J.
Right arrow Articles by McQuail, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Media Policy Paradigm Shifts

Towards a New Communications Policy Paradigm

Jan van Cuilenburg

Denis McQuail

This article deals with communications and media policy paradigms. In the US and Western Europe three paradigmatic phases of communications and media policy may be distinguished: the paradigm of emerging communications industry policy (until the Second World War); the paradigm of public service media policy (1945-1980/90); and the current phase (from 1980/90 onwards) in which a new policy paradigm is searched for. In Phase I, communications and media policy primarily referred to the emerging technologies of telegraph, telephony and wireless. Communications policy in that era was mainly pursued for reasons of state interest and financial corporate benefits. After the Second World War, media policy was dominated by sociopolitical rather than economic or national strategic concerns. In this paradigmatic phase, lasting until 1980/90, the ideal of public service broadcasting was at its height, notably in Western Europe. From 1980 onwards, however, technological, economic and social trends fundamentally changed the context of media policy. In many countries, governments opted for policies of breaking monopolies in media and communications and privatizing as much as possible. The old normative media policies have been challenged and policy-makers are searching for a new communications policy paradigm. In this new paradigm, there seems to be a shift in the balance of component political, social and economic values that shape the definition of the public interest that media and communications supposedly serve. The authors conclude by sketching the core principles of the new communications policy paradigm that currently seems to be emerging.

Key Words: access • communications policy • diversity • freedom of communication • media policy

European Journal of Communication, Vol. 18, No. 2, 181-207 (2003)
DOI: 10.1177/0267323103018002002


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ConvergenceHome page
M. Latzer
Convergence Revisited: Toward a Modified Pattern of Communications Governance
Convergence, November 1, 2009; 15(4): 411 - 426.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Communication InquiryHome page
M. Ots
Efficient Servants of Pluralism or Marginalized Media Policy Tools?: The Case of Swedish Press Subsidies
Journal of Communication Inquiry, October 1, 2009; 33(4): 376 - 392.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
European Journal of CommunicationHome page
B. Grummell
The Educational Character of Public Service Broadcasting: From Cultural Enrichment to Knowledge Society
European Journal of Communication, September 1, 2009; 24(3): 267 - 285.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
European Journal of CommunicationHome page
M. Puppis
National Media Regulation in the Era of Free Trade: The Role of Global Media Governance
European Journal of Communication, December 1, 2008; 23(4): 405 - 424.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
GazetteHome page
R. A. Breit
Journalistic Self-Regulation in Australia: Is it Ready for the Information Society?
International Communication Gazette, December 1, 2008; 70(6): 505 - 528.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
ConvergenceHome page
H. Van den Bulck
Can PSB Stake its Claim in a Media World of Digital Convergence?: The Case of the Flemish PSB Management Contract Renewal from an International Perspective
Convergence, August 1, 2008; 14(3): 335 - 349.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Media Culture SocietyHome page
J. Bardoel and L. d'Haenens
Reinventing public service broadcasting in Europe: prospects, promises and problems
Media Culture Society, May 1, 2008; 30(3): 337 - 355.
[PDF]


Home page
International Journal of Comparative SociologyHome page
F. J. Lechner
Redefining National Identity: Dutch Evidence on Global Patterns
International Journal of Comparative Sociology, August 1, 2007; 48(4): 355 - 368.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Media Culture SocietyHome page
M. Sourbati
Digital Television, Online Connectivity and Electronic Service Delivery: Implications for Communications Policy (and Research)
Media Culture Society, July 1, 2004; 26(4): 585 - 590.
[PDF]