|
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
|
Media Policy Paradigm Shifts
Towards a New Communications Policy Paradigm
Jan van Cuilenburg
Denis McQuail
This article deals with communications and media policy paradigms. In the US and Western Europe three paradigmatic phases of communications and media policy may be distinguished: the paradigm of emerging communications industry policy (until the Second World War); the paradigm of public service media policy (1945-1980/90); and the current phase (from 1980/90 onwards) in which a new policy paradigm is searched for. In Phase I, communications and media policy primarily referred to the emerging technologies of telegraph, telephony and wireless. Communications policy in that era was mainly pursued for reasons of state interest and financial corporate benefits. After the Second World War, media policy was dominated by sociopolitical rather than economic or national strategic concerns. In this paradigmatic phase, lasting until 1980/90, the ideal of public service broadcasting was at its height, notably in Western Europe. From 1980 onwards, however, technological, economic and social trends fundamentally changed the context of media policy. In many countries, governments opted for policies of breaking monopolies in media and communications and privatizing as much as possible. The old normative media policies have been challenged and policy-makers are searching for a new communications policy paradigm. In this new paradigm, there seems to be a shift in the balance of component political, social and economic values that shape the definition of the public interest that media and communications supposedly serve. The authors conclude by sketching the core principles of the new communications policy paradigm that currently seems to be emerging.
Key Words: access communications policy diversity freedom of communication media policy
European Journal of Communication, Vol. 18, No. 2,
181-207 (2003)
DOI: 10.1177/0267323103018002002

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati Twitter What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Latzer
Convergence Revisited: Toward a Modified Pattern of Communications Governance
Convergence,
November 1, 2009;
15(4):
411 - 426.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Ots
Efficient Servants of Pluralism or Marginalized Media Policy Tools?: The Case of Swedish Press Subsidies
Journal of Communication Inquiry,
October 1, 2009;
33(4):
376 - 392.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
B. Grummell
The Educational Character of Public Service Broadcasting: From Cultural Enrichment to Knowledge Society
European Journal of Communication,
September 1, 2009;
24(3):
267 - 285.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Puppis
National Media Regulation in the Era of Free Trade: The Role of Global Media Governance
European Journal of Communication,
December 1, 2008;
23(4):
405 - 424.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. A. Breit
Journalistic Self-Regulation in Australia: Is it Ready for the Information Society?
International Communication Gazette,
December 1, 2008;
70(6):
505 - 528.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
H. Van den Bulck
Can PSB Stake its Claim in a Media World of Digital Convergence?: The Case of the Flemish PSB Management Contract Renewal from an International Perspective
Convergence,
August 1, 2008;
14(3):
335 - 349.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. Bardoel and L. d'Haenens
Reinventing public service broadcasting in Europe: prospects, promises and problems
Media Culture Society,
May 1, 2008;
30(3):
337 - 355.
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
F. J. Lechner
Redefining National Identity: Dutch Evidence on Global Patterns
International Journal of Comparative Sociology,
August 1, 2007;
48(4):
355 - 368.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Sourbati
Digital Television, Online Connectivity and Electronic Service Delivery: Implications for Communications Policy (and Research)
Media Culture Society,
July 1, 2004;
26(4):
585 - 590.
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|
|