This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Crespi, F. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Social Action and the Ambivalence of Communication: A Critique of Habermas's Theory

The problem of communication seems to be considered in our culture along two main opposing lines: on the one hand, as a development which can endanger the individual and collective capacity to control social complexity; on the other hand, as a model for a new kind of rationality. The possibility of applying such different interpretations is perhaps revelatory of the ambivalence of communication as such. Through a critique of Habermas's theory of communicative rationality, the author shows that the inherent limitations and negative aspects of any form of discourse can never be overcome. It is necessary instead to reach a delicate balance between absolutization, which gives to communication forms their determinate character, and relativization, which recognizes that life experience is ever more complex than any symbolic expression of it can be.

European Journal of Communication, Vol. 2, No. 4, 415-425 (1987)
DOI: 10.1177/0267323187002004003


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				G. Islam and M. Zyphur Ways of interacting: The standardization of communication in medical training Human Relations, May 1, 2007; 60(5): 769 - 792. [Abstract] [PDF]