|
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
|
Parents' Interest in Videogame Ratings and Content Descriptors in Relation to Game Mediation
Peter Nikken
Netherlands Youth Institute, PO Box 19221, 3501 DE Utrecht, The Netherlands, p.nikken{at}nji.nl
Jeroen Jansz
Amsterdam School of Communications Research (ASCoR), University of Amsterdam, Kloveniersburgwal 48, 1012 CX Amsterdam, The Netherlands, J.Jansz{at}uva.nl
Sanneke Schouwstra
Department of Communication, University of Amsterdam, Kloveniersburgwal 48, 1012 CX Amsterdam, The Netherlands, S.J.Schouwstra{at}uva.nl
A B S T R A C T An Internet survey of 765 parents examined (1) to what extent parents wanted to be informed by ratings of harmful videogames for their children (four to 18 years), (2) which content descriptors interested them, (3) which parents were most interested and (4) how parental mediation of the child's gaming related to their interest in ratings and content descriptors. The majority of parents thought it very necessary to have ratings. Warnings of realistic `gore and gross' were considered most important, followed by warnings regarding alcohol/drugs, fantasy violence, bad language and, finally, nudity. A LISREL model showed that the ratings and most content descriptors were used as tools for restrictive and active parental mediation, in relation to parents' ideas on negative game effects. The mediation strategy of social co-play was strongly associated with the parents' own gaming and views on positive game effects.
Key Words: children parental mediation videogame ratings videogames young adolescents
European Journal of Communication, Vol. 22, No. 3,
315-336 (2007)
DOI: 10.1177/0267323107079684

CiteULike Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati What's this?
|
|