Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
European Journal of Communication
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Glastra, F.
Right arrow Articles by Kats, E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

The Filmic Construction of Tolerance: Representations of Interethnic Relations in Educational Films

Folke Glastra

Erik Kats

As in other West European countries, both ethnic minorities and immigration have become permanent features of Dutch society. Although there are differences between nationalities, it can be said that, on the whole, these minorities are socially and economically disadvantaged (Schumacher, 1987: 124, 173). In dealing with the problems involved, much use is made of educational films. These films are employed to inform ethnic minorities about rules and regulations of the Dutch welfare state and to provide the indigenous population with information about the cultural backgrounds of the newcomers. In our research, we analyse representations of interethnic relations in such films. In this article, we discuss some of the results of this detailed analysis. Educational films vary particularly with respect to the kind of contradictions they thematize, in their assumptions about the social actors involved and in the lines of development they sketch. In conclusion, we discuss the results of the analysis against the background of the myth of tolerance.

European Journal of Communication, Vol. 8, No. 3, 345-363 (1993)
DOI: 10.1177/0267323193008003005


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?