Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
European Journal of Communication
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Schmitt-Beck, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Intermediation Environments of West German and East German Voters: Interpersonal Communication and Mass Communication During the First All-German Election Campaign

Rüdiger Schmitt-Beck

The networks of interpersonal communication and the system of mass communication can be seen as intermediation environments that provide individual voters with links to the distant world of politics. This paper argues that, in order to gain an adequate impression of voters' relevant communication relationships during election campaigns, both intermediation environments must be studied simultaneously. Taking the example of the first all-German general election of 2 December 1990, the intermediation environments of East and West German voters are analysed in terms of the degree of exposure and the nature of the political messages to which voters are subjected through the two channels. Through interpersonal communication, voters mainly establish contact with persons sharing their own party preferences, whereas the mass media are perceived as neutral mediators by the majority of the voters. If a political bias of media reporting is detected, however, it tends to contradict voters' own party preferences. From a comparative perspective, it becomes evident that in the year of German unification West German voters had more in common with American voters than with the citizens of the former German Democratic Republic. The East-West differences are in particular due to the very high level of politicization of East Germans' daily life-world and to the lower degree of structuration of their communication relationships in terms of political attachment.

European Journal of Communication, Vol. 9, No. 4, 381-419 (1994)
DOI: 10.1177/0267323194009004002


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Science CommunicationHome page
C. W. TRUMBO
Communication Channels and Risk Information: A Cost-Utility Model
Science Communication, December 1, 1998; 20(2): 190 - 203.
[Abstract]