This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Kilborn, R. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

`How Real Can You Get?': Recent Developments in `Reality' Television

Since the late 1980s programme types loosely grouped in the category `reality programming' (RP) have made considerable inroads into both American and European television schedules. Sometimes, judging by the stir which various forms of RP have created, one might be led to believe that RP constitutes a major televisual innovation. As we shall discover, however, there is nothing intrinsically new about most of these reality strands. What is more striking is the speed with which they have caught on, together with the sheer multiplicity of different reality formats which have been developed. The vast majority of television networks and organizations, both in the US and in Europe, now produce their own reality programmes or screen acquired material, whilst the term `reality television' has achieved general currency, if not some notoriety.

This article examines some of the more significant features of RP and also considers the reasons for its popularity. An attempt is also made to show how the rise in this form of programming is related to more general developments in television over the last decade. Is it more than just coincidence, for instance, that the rise of RP has taken place at a time when television, whether publicly or privately funded, is becoming increasingly dominated by market-place considerations?

European Journal of Communication, Vol. 9, No. 4, 421-439 (1994)
DOI: 10.1177/0267323194009004003


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				H. Curnutt "A Fan Crashing the Party": Exploring Reality-celebrity in MTV's Real World Franchise Television New Media, May 1, 2009; 10(3): 251 - 266. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. Mast New directions in hybrid popular television: a reassessment of television mock-documentary Media Culture Society, March 1, 2009; 31(2): 231 - 250. [PDF]

				A. Dhoest "The Pfaffs Are Not Like the Osbournes": National Inflections of the Celebrity Docusoap Television New Media, May 1, 2005; 6(2): 224 - 245. [Abstract] [PDF]

				B. Wood A World in Retreat: The Reconfiguration of Hybridity in 20th-Century New Zealand Television Media Culture Society, January 1, 2004; 26(1): 45 - 62. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. Corner Performing the Real: Documentary Diversions Television New Media, August 1, 2002; 3(3): 255 - 269. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. Roscoe Big Brother Australia: Performing the 'real' twenty-four-seven International Journal of Cultural Studies, December 1, 2001; 4(4): 473 - 488. [Abstract] [PDF]

				A. Hill Fearful and Safe: Audience Response to British Reality Programming Television New Media, May 1, 2000; 1(2): 193 - 213. [PDF]

				A. Fetveit Reality TV in the digital era: a paradox in visual culture? Media Culture Society, November 1, 1999; 21(6): 787 - 804. [Abstract] [PDF]

				H. Dauncey French `Reality Television': More than a Matter of Taste? European Journal of Communication, March 1, 1996; 11(1): 83 - 106. [Abstract]

				J. Corner Editorial Media Culture Society, January 1, 1996; 18(1): 5 - 9.

				J. Petley Fact plus fiction equals friction Media Culture Society, January 1, 1996; 18(1): 11 - 25.

				R. Kilborn New contexts for documentary production in Britain Media Culture Society, January 1, 1996; 18(1): 141 - 150.