Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
European Journal of Communication
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Schlesinger, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

A Cosmopolitan Temptation

Philip Schlesinger

Centre for Cultural Policy Research, at the University of Glasgow, 9 University Avenue, Glasgow G12 8QQ, Scotland, p.schlesinger{at}ccpr.arts.gla.ac.uk

{blacksquare} For some, the transnationalization of political action and communicative space in the European Union heralds an emergent cosmopolitan order. Need that be so? There are supranational institutions in the EU as well as transnational political and cultural spaces and cross-border communicative flows. However, the Union's member states remain key controllers of citizenship rights and purveyors of collective identities. And for many purposes they still maintain strongly bounded national public spheres. Because the EU's overall character as a polity remains unresolved, this has consequences for the organization of communicative spaces. The EU is a field of tensions and contradictions that is inescapably rooted in institutional realities. Wishful thinking about cosmopolitanism can get in the way of clear analysis. {blacksquare}

Key Words: collective identity • cosmopolitanism • European Union • nation • public sphere • state

References

  • Anderson, Benedict (1991) Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism, 2nd edn. London: Verso.
  • Bauer, Otto (2000) The Question of Nationalities and Social Democracy, trans. Joseph O'Donnell. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
  • Beck, Ulrich (2006) Cosmopolitan Vision. Cambridge: Polity Press.
  • Billig, Michael (1995) Banal Nationalism. London: Sage.
  • Castells, Manuel (1998) End of Millennium. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
  • Castiglione, Dario and Chris Longman (eds) (2007) The Language Question in Europe and Diverse Societies: Political, Legal and Social Perspectives. Oxford: Hart Publishing.
  • Cormack, Mike and Niamh Hourigan (eds) (2007) Minority Language Media: Concepts, Critiques and Case Studies. Clevedon, Buffalo, OH and Toronto: Multilingual Matters Ltd.
  • Delanty, Gerard and Chris Rumford (2005) Rethinking Europe: Social Theory and the Implications of Europeanization. London: Routledge.
  • De Swaan, Abram (2007) `The European Void: The Democratic Deficit as a Cultural Deficiency', pp. 135—53 in J.E. Fossum and P. Schlesinger (eds) The European Union and the Public Sphere: A Communicative Space in the Making? London and New York: Routledge.
  • Deutsch, Karl W. (1966) Nationalism and Social Communication: An Inquiry into the Foundations of Nationality, 2nd edn. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Eder, Klaus (2007) `The Public Sphere and European Democracy: Mechanisms of Democratisation in the Transnational Situation', pp. 44—64 in J.E. Fossum and P. Schlesinger (eds) The European Union and the Public Sphere: A Communicative Space in the Making? London and New York: Routledge.
  • European Commission (2006 ) `White Paper on a European Communication Policy', COM (2006) 35 final, Brussels, 1 February 2006.
  • Fossum, John Erik and Philip Schlesinger (eds) (2007) The European Union and the Public Sphere: A Communicative Space in the Making? London and New York: Routledge.
  • Gellner, Ernest (1983) Nations and Nationalism. Oxford: Blackwell.
  • Gleissner, Martin and Claes H. de Vreese (2005) `News about the EU Constitution: Journalistic Challenges and Media Portrayal of the European Union Constitution', Journalism 6(2): 221—41.
  • Habermas, Jürgen (1996) Between Facts and Norms: Contribution to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Habermas, Jürgen (2004) `Why Europe Needs a Constitution', pp. 19—34 in E.O. Eriksen, J.E. Fossum and A.J. Menéndez (eds) Developing a Constitution for Europe. London and New York: Routledge.
  • Jouët, Josiane and Dominique Pasquier (eds) (2001) `Médias et migrations', Réseaux 19(107; monograph issue): 7—262.
  • Kevin, Deirdre (2003) Europe in the Media: A Comparison of Reporting, Representation, and Rhetoric in National Media Systems in Europe. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  • Moragas Spà, Miquel, Carmelo Garitaonandía and Bernat López (eds) (1999) Television on Your Doorstep: Decentralization Experiences in the European Union. Luton: University of Luton Press.
  • Schlesinger, Philip and François Foret ( 2006) `Political Roof and Sacred Canopy? Religion and the EU Constitution', European Journal of Social Theory 9(1): 59—81.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  • Splichal, Slavko (2006) `In Search of a Strong European Public Sphere: Some Critical Observations on Conceptualizations of Publicness and the (European) Public Sphere', Media, Culture and Society 28(5): 695—714.[CrossRef]
  • Trenz, Hans-Jörg and Klaus Eder (2004) `The Democratising Dynamics of a European Public Sphere: Towards a Theory of Democratic Functionalism', European Journal of Social Theory 7(1): 5—25.[Abstract]

European Journal of Communication, Vol. 22, No. 4, 413-426 (2007)
DOI: 10.1177/0267323107083059


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JournalismHome page
H. Heikkila and R. Kunelius
Ambivalent ambassadors and realistic reporters: The calling of cosmopolitanism and the seduction of the secular in EU journalism
Journalism, August 1, 2008; 9(4): 377 - 397.
[Abstract] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Schlesinger, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?